Penetration testing

What is the Scope of a Penetration Test?

10 min read
scope pen test
Stay ahead of the game
Loading

click here to copy URL

What Is the Scope of a Penetration Test?

Did you know that even just a single vulnerability can lead to a whole range of data breaches, financial loss, or reputational damage? That’s where penetration testing comes in, a controlled, ethical way to uncover weaknesses before attackers do.

Not all penetration tests are created equal, though. Their effectiveness relies heavily on the scope. Defining a clear penetration testing scope ensures the engagement is focused, efficient, and aligned with your organization’s security objectives. 

In this guide, we’ll break down what’s included in a penetration testing scope, the different types of scopes, approaches, and why getting it right matters for both your business and your testing partner.

What Is Included in a Penetration Testing Scope?

A penetration testing scope defines exactly what will be tested, how it will be tested, and the rules the testers must follow. A clear scope ensures the engagement is efficient, controlled, and aligned with your organization’s security objectives. While every assessment is tailored to the environment, most scopes include several core elements.

In-Scopes Assets– outlines the systems that the testers are authorized to assess. It may also include specific components within those assets, such as APIs, user roles, or mobile app builds.

Testing Boundaries and Exclusions- The scope will specify what is out of scope, such as legacy systems or production databases, where testing could create operational risk.

Attack Methods and Testing Approach– This section defines whether the engagement uses black‑box, grey‑box, or white‑box methods, as well as the level of exploitation permitted. 

User Access Levels-If the test includes authenticated assessments, the scope will outline which accounts are provided. 

Timeframes and Testing Windows– To reduce business disruption, many organizations specify approved testing hours or require out‑of‑hours testing. 

Regulatory Requirements- If the assessment must satisfy frameworks, the scope will highlight these so the testers can ensure all required controls are evaluated.

Reporting Requirements– Finally, the scope identifies the format, depth, and delivery of the final report. Aligning with the OWASP Penetration Test Reporting Standard (OPTRS) can help with clarity and consistency in reporting.

A well‑defined scope ensures both parties have a mutual understanding of expectations, helping the penetration test deliver accurate, actionable insights without introducing unnecessary risk.

Why Is Getting the Scope of a Test so Important?

Defining the scope of a penetration test is very important because it ensures the engagement is both effective and safe. Without a clear scope, testing can become unfocused, inefficient, or even risky, potentially causing unintended disruptions to systems.

A well-defined scope helps organizations prioritize their most valuable or vulnerable assets, allowing testers to concentrate on areas where security weaknesses could have the greatest impact. It also ensures that any limitations, such as systems that cannot be tested or times when testing should be avoided, are clearly understood.

A carefully agreed scope provides clarity for the testing team, setting expectations around methods, access levels, and objectives. This alignment not only reduces misunderstandings but also maximizes the usefulness of the final report, providing actionable insights tailored to the organization’s specific security goals.

Getting the scope right is about balancing thorough security testing with operational safety, efficiency, and relevance, laying the foundation for a successful penetration test that truly strengthens your organization’s security posture.

What Is Out of Scope in Penetration Testing?

Just as important as defining what is in scope is clarifying what is out of scope. Out-of-scope elements are systems, assets, or actions that the penetration test will deliberately avoid to prevent unnecessary risk, operational disruption, or legal issues. Clearly identifying these boundaries helps both the testers and the organization stay aligned.

Sensitive or Critical Systems

Some systems, such as live production databases, financial transaction servers, or medical equipment, may be too high-risk to test actively. These are often excluded to avoid downtime, data corruption, or service interruptions.

Third-Party Systems

Systems owned or managed by external vendors may be out of scope unless explicit permission is obtained. Testing these without consent can lead to legal consequences and contractual breaches.

Denial-of-Service Testing

Many organizations exclude denial-of-service (DoS) attacks from the engagement because they can unintentionally disrupt normal operations. If DoS testing is required, it is usually agreed upon separately under controlled conditions.

Physical Security

Unless the test explicitly includes social engineering or physical penetration testing, facilities, offices, and access-controlled areas are typically out of scope.

Specific User Accounts or Privileges

Testers may be restricted from using certain high-privilege accounts, administrative credentials, or sensitive roles to avoid accidental misuse or escalation beyond acceptable limits.

Non-Authorized Locations or Timeframes

Testing outside the agreed time windows, geographic locations, or network segments is generally prohibited to prevent interference with business operations or regulatory violations.

Clearly defining what is out of scope means that organizations can reduce operational risk, prevent misunderstandings, and make sure the penetration test focuses on the areas that matter most for security improvements.

Types of Penetration Testing Scope

Penetration testing scopes can vary widely depending on what an organization needs to protect and how deep the assessment should go. While each engagement is personal to the target environment, most scopes fall into one of three broad categories.

1. Asset‑Based Scope

This type of scope is centered around specific assets the organization wants to test. An asset‑based scope is ideal when you want focused testing on high‑risk or business‑critical systems.

2. Objective‑Based Scope

Instead of focusing on individual assets, an objective‑based scope defines what the testers should try to achieve. This approach mirrors real‑world attacker behavior and is useful for organizations looking to understand the potential impact of a breach.

3. Compliance‑Driven Scope

Some organizations require penetration testing to meet regulatory or industry standards. The testers focus on evaluating the systems and controls necessary for certification or ongoing compliance.

4. Full‑Environment Scope

A full‑environment scope covers an entire organization’s attack surface. This type of scope provides the broadest view of risk and is suitable for organizations undergoing major security reviews or preparing for mergers, acquisitions, or new certifications.

Each type of scope provides a different level of visibility, so choosing the right one depends on your objectives, budget, and the maturity of your security posture.

What Are the 3 Approaches to Penetration Testing?

Penetration tests can be categorised based on the level of information provided to the testers before the assessment. Understanding the different types of penetration testing helps organizations choose the approach that best aligns with their security objectives. The three main types are:

  1. Black-Box Testing- The penetration testers are given minimal information about the systems they are assessing. This approach focuses on discovering vulnerabilities that could be exploited from the outside. 
  2. White-Box Testing- Testers are given full knowledge of the environment. This approach allows for an in-depth assessment, uncovering vulnerabilities that may not be visible in a purely external perspective. 
  3. Grey-Box Testing- Testers have limited knowledge, such as user-level access or partial system information. This method simulates an attacker who has gained some insider knowledge or limited credentials, helping to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by both internal and external threats.

Choosing the right type of penetration test depends on your organization’s security goals, risk appetite, and the specific systems being assessed. Each approach offers different insights, from external attack resilience to internal system weaknesses, enabling organizations to make informed decisions about where to prioritize security improvements.

What Are the Different Types of Penetration Testing?

Penetration testing is not a one-size-fits-all activity. Depending on your organization’s environment and objectives, different types of penetration tests can be conducted to evaluate specific areas of security. 

These tests are usually categorized based on the target system, the perspective of the tester, or the type of attack simulated.

Network Penetration Testing

Network penetration testing focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in an organization’s internal and external networks. Testers evaluate firewalls, routers, switches, and other network components to find weaknesses that could allow unauthorized access, data breaches, or lateral movement within the network.

Web Application Penetration Testing

Web application tests target online applications and websites to uncover vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), authentication flaws, and misconfigured APIs. 

Mobile Application Penetration Testing

Mobile app testing assesses vulnerabilities in mobile applications across platforms like iOS and Android. Testers look for insecure data storage, weak authentication, improper session management, and other issues that could compromise sensitive information on users’ devices.

Wireless Network Penetration Testing

Wireless network penetration testing evaluates the security of Wi-Fi networks, including encryption strength, rogue access points, and misconfigured wireless protocols. It helps prevent unauthorized network access and eavesdropping.

Social Engineering and Physical Penetration Testing

Some tests simulate attacks on employees or physical infrastructure to identify risks from human factors. Social engineering tests may include phishing, pretexting, or baiting, while physical penetration testing examines access controls, locks, or security cameras.

Cloud and API Penetration Testing

Cloud-based systems and APIs are increasingly common attack vectors. Cloud penetration testing evaluates the security of cloud configurations and storage permissions to ensure that sensitive data is protected and that integrations do not introduce vulnerabilities.

Each type of penetration test provides unique insights into an organization’s security. Choosing the right combination depends on your objectives, regulatory requirements, and the potential impact of a security breach.

How Is Penetration Testing Performed?

Penetration testing is carried out through a structured process that simulates real‑world attacks in a controlled and ethical manner. Many organizations structure these phases according to the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES)

1. Planning and Reconnaissance

The first stage involves understanding the target environment. Testers gather information about networks, systems, applications, and users. 

This may include reviewing documentation, mapping network architecture, analyzing publicly available data, and identifying potential entry points. This groundwork helps define the testing strategy and the areas most likely to present vulnerabilities.

2. Vulnerability Assessment

Once the initial information is collected, testers begin actively probing the systems in scope for weaknesses.  Automated tools and manual techniques are used to detect misconfigurations, outdated software, weak authentication, and insecure coding practices. 

This stage helps uncover both obvious and complex vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

3. Exploitation

After vulnerabilities are identified, testers attempt to exploit them in a controlled manner to understand the potential impact. 

This may involve gaining unauthorized access, escalating privileges, or moving through the network. The goal is to simulate real‑world attack scenarios while remaining within the agreed boundaries of the engagement.

4. Analysis and Reporting

Findings are validated and documented, detailing each vulnerability, its severity, and the potential business impact. 

The report provides actionable recommendations for remediation and may include a risk ranking to help organizations prioritize fixes. Some engagements also include a debriefing session to explain findings to stakeholders.

5. Retesting

Many penetration tests include a retest phase to verify that vulnerabilities have been effectively addressed. This ensures that remediation efforts have strengthened the security posture and that previously discovered weaknesses no longer pose a risk.

Choosing a Pentest Provider 

A clear and accurate penetration testing scope is important for both your organization and your testing provider. Unexpected costs or additional work at the end of an engagement can be frustrating, so defining the scope correctly from the start is key.

Selecting the right penetration testing partner is also an important part of the process. You need a team with the expertise to guide you and deliver clear, actionable insights. A good provider will work collaboratively with you throughout, ensuring the test aligns with your objectives and operates smoothly from start to finish.

Book a demo with Rootshell Security to see our penetration testing services in action. Our friendly expert team will be happy to assist with any questions you may have. 

Picture of Shaun Peapell
Shaun Peapell
Shaun Peapell is the Vice President of Global Threat Services at Rootshell Security, leading efforts in penetration testing and threat intelligence. He is actively involved in industry discussions on continuous testing methodologies.​

Other posts you might like